Take the 2-minute tour ×
Sports Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for participants in team and individual sport activities. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose, A batsman is on strike with 98 runs. The scores are level so the batting team requires only 1 run to win. Now suppose in the next ball, the bowler bowls a No ball and the batsman hits FOUR or SIX. Will the batsman reach to his century or not?

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 17 down vote accepted

I found it! When the batting team requires only 1 run to win and batsman scores run(s) on No ball it does not count towards batsman's runs. So in the given case the batsman will remain on 98 and batting side will win the match.

Real Case:

In the 3rd match between Sri Lanka and India in Sri Lanka Triangular Series, 2010 (between Sri Lanka, India and New Zealand), India required 1 run to win and Virender Sehwag was on strike with 99 runs. Suraj Randiv was the bowler. He bowled a No ball and Sehwag smashed a Six but still Sehwag remained on 99 runs because India won the match before he score runs. Have a look at commentary on Cricinfo (see from 35th over).

share|improve this answer
2  
There you go, what a bizarre rule. I'll see if I can find the exact wording in the rules. It seems the no-ball was deliberate and this is a common occurance in sub-continental cricket. You'd never see that happen in Australia, for one because it would be considered bad sportsmanship and two because the bowler would cop a bat to the skull. –  Bogdanovist Jan 22 '13 at 9:06
1  
Here is the rule on this, as far as I can tell although it doesn't make it very clear:6. Winning hit or extras (a) As soon as a result is reached as defined in 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5(a) above, the match is at an end. Nothing that happens thereafter, except as in Law 42.17(b) (Penalty runs), shall be regarded as part of it. Note also 9 below. (b) The side batting last will have scored enough runs to win only if its total of runs is sufficient without including any runs completed by the batsmen before the completion of a catch, or the obstruction of a catch, from which the striker could be dismissed. –  Bogdanovist Jan 22 '13 at 9:16
1  
(c) If a boundary is scored before the batsmen have completed sufficient runs to win the match, the whole of the boundary allowance shall be credited to the side’s total and, in the case of a hit by the bat, to the striker’s score. –  Bogdanovist Jan 22 '13 at 9:16
1  
So the rules are clear that all runs from any boundary count, even if they are excess, but I guess once a ball is a no-ball then part (a) applies and the game is over, regardless of what the batsmen does. It seems from the article @hims056 linked to that the players are as bemused by this as I am. Very odd rule. –  Bogdanovist Jan 22 '13 at 9:18
1  

No,it won't go to the batsman,it will be counted as extras.

UPDATE:

As per Wikipedia:

A no ball does not count as one of the six balls in an over, but it counts as a ball faced by the batsman. When a no ball is bowled, a number of runs are awarded to the batting team, the number varying depending on local playing conditions in force. In Test cricket and One Day International cricket the award is one run; in some domestic competitions, particularly one-day cricket competitions, the award is two runs. These runs are scored as extras and are added to the batting team's total, but are not added to any batsman's total. For scoring, no balls are considered to be the fault of the bowler (even if the infringement was committed by a fielder), and since the early 1980s, are recorded as a negative statistic in a bowler's record.

share|improve this answer
    
Welcome to Sports SE! Thanks for your answer. Is this reflected within the rules of cricket? –  edmastermind29 Jan 21 '13 at 17:53
    
@edmastermind29 see updated answer. –  joey rohan Jan 21 '13 at 17:57
    
Thanks. I added the link for reference. Welcome again. –  edmastermind29 Jan 21 '13 at 18:04
    
Hi, the excerpt you have quoted is referring to the extra runs of the NoBall itself (usually the 1 run), and not to the runs scored by the batsman. If you read a few lines below: "If the batsman hits the ball he may take runs as normal. These are scored as runs by the batsman, as normal..." –  Aswin Kumar Mar 24 '13 at 9:28

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.