Take the 2-minute tour ×
Sports Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for participants in team and individual sport activities. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Although it seems rather counter-intuitive to me, I have heard multiple times that running just a single Marathon per season is more unhealthy than 3-4 Marathons per season.

The reasoning seems to be that it should be rather stressful to the body to get in shape for the first Marathon, but keeping fit between runs shouldn't so bad.

I have looked for some materials on the web to clarify the issue, but to no avail. Can anybody clarify the issue for me?

share|improve this question
    
Hi Tonny! You should ask Joergen Pedersen, your former colleague! :) –  Tomas Feb 17 '12 at 12:12

4 Answers 4

up vote 3 down vote accepted

It would seem there are so many variables involved that are independent of the number of marathons you run to make any such conclusion meaningless.

For example:

  • personal fitness
  • training schedule
  • injuries
  • genetics (how you handle running)
  • Racing vs running the marathon

Clearly for an ultra marathoner who has spent decades training, running one or three marathons a month even may not make a difference.

At the other extreme a newbie who is working towards their first marathon, should probably find three marathons in a season a really bad plan.

However in between is where the interesting bits happen.

There is value in keeping your base training for longer, and just using the marathons along the way as long training runs, perhaps at a faster pace.

I notice the question did not ask, Racing 3 marathons vs 1. I think that is a key distinction as well. If you race the marathons, then that is very different than just running them.

I suspect this is one of those 'it really depends' answers.

share|improve this answer
    
I should think that many of the people that run Marathon - opposed to racing the same Mathon - might feel they are in fact racing... or at least going as fast as they possibly can :-) –  Tonny Madsen Feb 12 '12 at 16:11
    
@TonnyMadsen Interestingly enough, I would define Racing vs Running as totally personal. I.e. My racing is what many would consider jogging. I am slow, however, if I am running at a pace that takes me to my goal, then that is racing. I make no value claims on speed. It is all personal. –  geoffc Feb 12 '12 at 16:48
    
So racing is when you run as fast as you possibly can. –  Tonny Madsen Feb 12 '12 at 19:06
    
@TonnyMadsen Not quite. I would argue it is when you pace yourself for a time you consider racing. I.e. In a marathon your pace would differ from a 5K and therefore you could try to run a 5K pace, but it will kill you over the marathon distance, so you need a different pace for different distances. –  geoffc Feb 12 '12 at 23:40

Last year I ran two ultras and four marathons, all quite slowly, all but one with negative splits, and it feels very good. I completed two marathons on two consecutive weekends, and enjoyed them both.

Before that, I was trying to improve my speed, running 1-2 races per year, and that definitely was less healthy for me. I did not like tapering - last week before the race just felt terrible. I hated the recovery - I'd rather work out than rest because of sore muscles.

So, for me trying to run one marathon per year with full effort was not healthy and not enjoyable at all. Running multiple ones with enjoyable speed, not hitting the wall ever, with negative splits, and no pain is a lot of fun. I am just staying in shape all the time, and enjoying a good scenic race whenever I feel like it.

We are all different. What works for me might not work for others. I am not cut out for fast running: I do not look like a lean gazelle. On the other hand, having considerable muscles and thick and strong tendons allows me to run injury-free, even though it prevents me from running fast.

I have lean friends who have real chances to qualify for Boston, (1-2 minutes short), but keep spending considerable time every year limping. They are much faster but more prone to injuries.

share|improve this answer

It's not actually running the marathons that's more healthy, it's staying in marathon shape for the whole time, as opposed to building up to a marathon, then letting yourself go for the rest of the season, then having to build up for the next marathon, etc. Building up is where you are most likely to injure yourself, so staying in shape between marathons is the important thing, not running more of them.

share|improve this answer

I don't think these long runs are a healthy or natural activity for the human body, so the fewer the better. If you are interested in health rather than marathon performance, mix up your exercise types, include high intensity and weight bearing activities as well.

share|improve this answer
    
I agree... Almost everything we discuss on this site, is not healthy when done in the competitive manner... And Marathon running is likely very unhealthy for my body. But it is extremely healthy for my mind! But my question was comparative: is one more unhealthy than three? –  Tonny Madsen Feb 17 '12 at 8:10

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.