Sports Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for participants in team and individual sport activities. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Currently the National Hockey League awards:

  • 2 points to a team winning (whether in regulation, overtime, or a shootout)
  • 1 point to a team losing in overtime or a shootout
  • 0 points to a team losing in regulation

I have derived the following point system based on the NHL's:

  • 3 points to a team winning in regulation.
  • 2 points to a team winning in overtime or a shootout.
  • 1 point to a team losing in overtime or a shootout.
  • 0 points to a team losing in regulation.

One benefit to this derived system is that it offers greater incentive to win in regulation and discourages playing defensively when tied especially in games that are significant to the standings.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of this derived system that I've failed to consider?

share|improve this question

closed as primarily opinion-based by Sports Fan, Dor Cohen, Rory Alsop, Bogdanovist, ᴍᴀsᴛᴇʀᴍɪɴᴅ_ᴇᴅ Jul 12 '13 at 13:10

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

BTW such system is used in KHL. I've tried to search online for some discussion comparing KHL and NHL from this viewpoint, but I did not find one. – Martin May 20 '13 at 6:51

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.