Take the 2-minute tour ×
Sports Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for participants in team and individual sport activities. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

Please somebody explain, why can't referee just wait a few seconds, and look at the at the telebim, and then decide if it was a foul, or if ball crossed the goal line. It would solve many issues.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Nicholas V., RoB, NetStarter, wax eagle, edmastermind29 Mar 28 at 13:27

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1  
It would also dramatically increase the length of the game. –  Nicholas V. Mar 25 at 12:12
    
I don't think so. In the time after whistle players are trying to convince referee and discuss with him. it takes preety long time. If referee would decide after waching the replays, discussion with him would be pointless. –  Jebajło Rypacz Mar 25 at 12:17
2  
I think it's because not every league can afford that kind of technology. –  PRO_gramista Mar 25 at 13:36
    
I answered a similar question to this sports.stackexchange.com/questions/4309/… –  RoB Mar 25 at 14:30

1 Answer 1

Short version answer: Because is not in the rules.

Long version answer: It can be implemented, but if you look at this question answers, you could see that there are other important aspect of the game that could be improved..

The 4th referee (or the 6th in a 5 referee game) could watch and decide, but it would involve several changes in the rules, like stopping time, give power to another officer to make the call, and what to do in that situation.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.