Timeline for What could be the advantage of doping in curling?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 3, 2018 at 3:03 | review | First posts | |||
Mar 3, 2018 at 6:39 | |||||
Feb 26, 2018 at 23:16 | comment | added | Andre | not in curling, which is what I was referring to there. As a swimmer I see how it could have a huge difference. Even 0.01 of a second is a good advantage. I don’t really know much about curling. It just looks like lawn bowls on ice to me. | |
Feb 26, 2018 at 23:03 | comment | added | aaaaa says reinstate Monica | @andre "for such a minimal advantage" have you seen how little time/points is there between #1 and #2 in olympics? But you need to pretty damn good already | |
Feb 26, 2018 at 21:00 | comment | added | Andre | for such a minimal advantage it’s pretty stupid to do it. Assuming everyone is checked the same, you’re getting a lot more for your risk if you do it for a more athletic event. I’d actually quite like to see a similar tournament to the Olympics for people who openly take enhancing drugs. It’d be quite interesting to see how far we can push our bodies. | |
Feb 26, 2018 at 20:38 | comment | added | aaaaa says reinstate Monica | @andre why drugs not gonna make you lift 1000 pounds when you were lifting maybe 300? My point was that drugs can make you a little bit better at what you do, doesn't matter what. A bit extra brain-muscle coordination and you can throw that stone more precise. But drugs are not magic, but an ace card | |
Feb 26, 2018 at 12:24 | comment | added | Andre | "The point is that if you are a curler and take drugs, you will not magically start lifting 1000 pounds, but you will be better at curling that your equally able competitor." Explain how this is the case? | |
Feb 20, 2018 at 21:37 | history | answered | aaaaa says reinstate Monica | CC BY-SA 3.0 |