I saw a crazy stat today where Fernando Tatis Sr. hit two grand slams in a single inning, and crazily enough both off of Chan Ho Park, on April 23, 1999 in a game between the St. Louis Cardinals and the L.A. Dodgers, something that has never been done before or since.
Baseball-Reference.com records Park as pitching 2.2 innings that day and giving up 11 runs. However, only 6 of them were counted as earned.
Pitching IP H R ER BB SO HR ERA
Chan Ho Park L (1-2) 2.2 8 11 6 3 2 3 7.32
Carlos Perez 4.1 3 1 1 0 4 1 7.06
Jeff Kubenka 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 12.27
Team Totals 9 11 12 7 5 7 4 7.00
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
I don't know what the official rules on this were back in 1999, but I can't imagine they changed much.
9.16 Earned Runs and Runs Allowed
An earned run is a run for which a pitcher is held accountable. In determining earned runs, the Official Scorer shall reconstruct the inning without the errors (which exclude catcher’s interference) and passed balls, giving the benefit of the doubt always to the pitcher in determining which bases would have been reached by runners had there been errorless play.
I get that it depends on the situation, but to me, given that at least 8 of the runs (in just this one inning) came off Tatis' two grand slams and not as a result of any error (i.e. these were legitimate hits), how is it that Park isn't charged at least 8 earned runs as well?