4

A few games ago Clayton Kershaw of the Dodgers scooped up a bunt down the first base line and pegged the runner square in the back who was just running straight down the baseline like anyone would. The runner didn't otherwise in any way impede the defensive players, it was just a mistaken throw that hit the runner.

But the runner was immediately called out. The first baseman never touched the ball. Everyone including the announcers just understood it to be an out. Why?

If a catcher throws down to second base to get a guy trying to steal, and the ball hits the runner, he is not automatically out. If the guy in right field throws a ball to third base and hits the runner sliding into third, he is not automatically out. What then is the reasoning and rule that allows the guy running to first to be out?

[Edit: keywords so this information can be found: "45-foot lane", "runner's lane"]

1
  • 1
    I tried to find the play, but didn't see any bunts fielded by Kershaw in the play-by-play from his most recent start. Without seeing the play, I'm guessing that the runner was outside of the running 'lane' up the first base line. If the batter/runner is hit by a throw while running outside that lane, he can be ruled out.
    – jerepierre
    May 9, 2015 at 17:34

3 Answers 3

8

For the last-half of the distance to first base, a runner should not step inside the foul line, for if a fielder makes a throw parallel down the line to first, it is construed that the runner is interfering with pay.

There is a second chalk line, along the first base line, called the 45-foot line for just this purpose, defining the 3-foot wide runner's lane a runner must be within.

Arizona Diamondback Stadium

MLB Rule 6.05(k) In running the last half of the distance from home base to first base, while the ball is being fielded to first base, he runs outside (to the right of) the three-foot line, or inside (to the left of) the foul line, and in the umpires judgment in so doing interferes with the fielder taking the throw at first base, in which case the ball is dead; except that he may run outside (to the right of) the threefoot line or inside (to the left of) the foul line to avoid a fielder attempting to field a batted ball;

Rule 6.05(k) Comment: The lines marking the three-foot lane are a part of that lane and a batter- runner is required to have both feet within the three-foot lane or on the lines marking the lane. The batter-runner is permitted to exit the three-foot lane by means of a step, stride, reach or slide in the immediate vicinity of first base for the sole purpose of touching first base.

Detail and examples:

So, for the last half of the 90 foot distance to first base the runner must not have his left foot even one inch on the dirt inside the chalk foul-line, until that last moment he steps over to touch the bag, because the bag is inside the foul line.

This is never a problem for runners veering out to round for second, but running out first base straight down the line – even if both feet of the runner are hitting the chalk line he is supposed to run down, but his left foot is just an inch over the line into the infield – he can be called out for interference of a thrown ball. He can be called out instantly (dead ball) even if the throw does not hit the runner, but the home plate umpire (who has the call, not the first base umpire) determines the throw was interfered with. (Note: A throw must be made for interference to occur.)

I just saw the play again (5/17/2015, Rockies -vs- Dodgers, @55:00) and even though the throw from the catcher down the line was way over the head of the first baseman - a ball that was not even catchable - and the player was never hit by the ball – the umpire still called the runner out immediately before he even got to first.

It is very odd to watch, because the runner was just going down the line like everyone does, within the 1 foot or so width of the first base plate he was running towards, but his feet were just slightly to the left of the foul line, so he was infield, and thus “outside the runner's lane”.

So basically every single runner just runs down the line – every single little league, high school, college, and evern pro game. But 1 in 1000 times a fielder has to make a throw directly down the line, this becomes interference.

I always though a runner had the right to run straight down the line, but he does not. He has to run to the right of the line down to first for the last 45 feet.

Ref.

Scenario: Dropped third strike or bunt where the thrown ball hits the runner on his way to first

Runner runs to first running "inside the running lane" (between the foul line and 45-foot line) and is hit with the ball before touching first base.

Correct call: “runner is safe“

Scenario: Runner runs to first running outside the running lane and is hit with the ball before touching first base.

Correct call: “runner is out“

(So far, so good, fairly straight forward in those two situations.)

Scenario: Fielder sees that the runner is running out of the running lane and is in the way of the throw, so he holds the ball and doesn't make the throw.

Correct call: “runner is safe“

Explanation: In the rule you'll notice that interference is "with the fielder taking the throw at first base". So if there is no throw, then there is no interference.

Scenario: Runner runs to first running within the running lane and is hit with the ball before touching first base on his last step as he moves over to touch first base.

Correct call: “runner is safe“

Explanation: The runner is allowed to move over out of the running lane to touch first base and clearly if he is moving over at the end of the running lane, his intent is to touch first base and not interfere with the throw.

Scenario: First baseman sets up in foul territory to receive the throw from the catcher on a dropped third strike. Runner runs to first running outside the running lane (to the left in fair territory) and is hit with the ball before touching first base.

Correct call: “runner is safe“

Explanation: The runner is allowed to exit the running lane in order avoid a fielder, which in this case is a first baseman who is standing directly in the running lane. Since the runner is running to the left of the running lane he is not intentionally trying to interfere with the throw or the first baseman and should be called safe.

Scenario: First baseman sets up in foul territory to receive the throw from the catcher on a dropped third strike. Runner runs to first running outside the running lane (to the left in fair territory) and then moves into the running lane and is hit with the ball before touching first base.

Correct call: “runner is safe“

Explanation: If in the judgment of the umpire, the runner made an "egregious" move where it is obvious that he is deliberately trying to be hit by the ball or interfering with the first baseman's ability to catch the ball, then the runner should be called out. But the runner is protected by the running lane and that move alone to get back in the running lane should not be construed as "intent".

1

On a baseball field you will see a line to the side of the first base foul line. This is the runners lane. A runner my run to first any way he wants (ie inside the foul line, or in an arc on a base hit) but if he is out of the lane and hit by a throw, he is out. If he would have been hit and in the lane he would not be out.

There is some controversy on this rule because you will notice the base it to the left of the foul line and the lane is to the right, meaning the runner would have to step to his left at the end to touch the base and stay in the runners lane.

2
  • The slow-mo replay showed the runner's feet hitting the chalk line the entire first half of the run, but I suppose he must have veered inwards after that at some point and everyone saw it except for me. Thanks.
    – ipso
    May 9, 2015 at 23:30
  • @ipso it only matters when he is hit by the throw. If he want in the lane then he should be called out. And vice versa.
    – diggers3
    May 9, 2015 at 23:35
1

To be clear, the batter-runner is free to be out of the running lane provided that he does not interfere with the fielder receiving the throw at 1st by being out of the running lane. In fact, it's very common for right-handed batters to not be completely within the confines of the running lane but, most of the time, it isn't a factor.

We mostly think of the batter-runner being in violation of the running lane rule when he is running to 1st base in fair territory while the ball is being fielded in the area around home plate. But, let's say the batter chases a curve in the dirt for strike three that deflects off to the catcher's ri

1
  • 2
    You seem to have got distracted while writing the second paragraph!
    – Philip Kendall
    Sep 26 at 18:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.