American teams are always named as [city/region team is from] + [team's actual name]

Los Angeles Lakers, Denver Broncos, NY Yankees, Chicago Fire, etc.

Is there a specific reason for that?

  • Most likely because these teams are trademarked names of a company property, not representatives of an associated sports group.
    – Nij
    Dec 27 '16 at 3:32
  • @Nij Companies being NFL or NBA I assume?
    – SarpSTA
    Dec 27 '16 at 3:42
  • @leDominatre: There are some exceptions, such as Sporting KC, which are generally straight copies of English or European football club names. Dec 29 '16 at 4:21
  • 1
    @MichaelMyers Their name was Kansas City Wizards before that. They changed it in 2010, probably in an attempt to look more European-like just like how other MLS teams also do.
    – SarpSTA
    Dec 29 '16 at 16:38

The answer to why all the U.S. professional teams are named this way (Location Nickname) today is because it is tradition. Baseball teams were named this way, and football, basketball, hockey, and soccer (in the U.S.) all came after baseball.

Baseball teams weren't always named this way, however. The National Association of Professional Base Ball Players was the first professional baseball league (1871-1875). A few teams in this league had modern sounding names (Boston Red Stockings, Chicago White Stockings), but many teams in this league had official names like Mutual Baseball Club of New York, Athletic Base Ball Club of Philadelphia, Union Base Ball Club Lansingburgh, Lord Baltimore Club, etc. Box scores in the newspaper would shorten these club names to one word, based on either their city or their club name: Boston, Chicago, Mutual, Athletic, Troy, Lord Baltimore, etc. The sportswriters would give the teams their own nicknames, usually based on the colors of their uniforms or the name of their field. For example, the Union Base Ball Club Lansingburgh played at Haymakers' Grounds in Troy, NY. As a result, their team was often called the Haymakers or the Trojans. Lord Baltimore got the nicknames Canaries and Yellow Stockings, because of the uniforms. Modern sportswriters, in writing about the history of these old teams, have retroactively assigned modern style names to some of these teams: they are now referred to with names New York Mutuals, Philadelphia Athletics, Troy Haymakers, and Baltimore Canaries.

In 1876, six clubs from the National Association broke off and started the current National League, including two teams with old style names: Mutual and Athletic. Those two teams lasted only one season, and all that was left in this baseball league were teams with the modern name format.

There are several advantages of the Location Nickname format. When reading or hearing about the team, you immediately know where the team is located. It allows for there to be more than one team in a single city or more than one team with the same nickname, yet have unique names for each. It also is an attempt to build a fanbase; having your city name (or region name) in your team name is supposed to signify that you are the official team of your city, and everyone who lives there should be a fan.

  • So you are saying the US started the tradition?
    – Coach-D
    Dec 28 '16 at 2:58
  • @Coach-D I don't know where/when this style of name started, but I would say that this is where the other style of name fell away in the U.S. Dec 28 '16 at 3:01
  • Just saying it isn't really tradition if it copies another region because of another reason. By that logic everything is tradition then.
    – Coach-D
    Dec 28 '16 at 3:17
  • 3
    @Coach-D Maybe tradition isn't the best word, but my point in the first sentence is that this style of name was already established as the standard before football and basketball took off. That's why the rest of the answer focuses on baseball. Dec 28 '16 at 3:22
  • 3
    @Coach-D I think the reasons why are in your answer (which I upvoted) and in my last paragraph. And yes, small rec leagues entirely contained in one town do not do this, for obvious reasons. Dec 28 '16 at 22:08

In most places in the world there is a considerable amount of space between different competing teams in the same league. The naming convention used in the US is not just the US but is also many/most sports teams in the world. I played a little basketball in France and yes all of the teams use that convention, albeit with more emphasis on the city name.

Really it is either about league rules or selling tickets or both. You want to associate with a local city with a high population because most of the tickets will need to come from that fan base. I would say that many teams in the big 4 sports in the US have stadiums that are not in the city of their name but often a town close to the bigger city.

A couple of examples:

  • New York Giants and Jets, which both play play in New Jersey. The name New York though keeps allegiance with 95% of the regional population to those teams.
  • MLB's Angels changed their "city name" to California. It is obvious they were done competing with the Dodgers at the time and wanted to appeal to people in cities outside of L.A. more. Not sure it worked at all but that was the reason.
  • San Francisco 49ers wanted a new stadium. SF is totally built out. So they built a stadium in Santa Clara which by any means cannot be considered even a suburb of SF. They kept the SF name due to the historical significance and population that would buy tickets.

Why Manchester United and other teams in the UK don't follow that trend is exactly the same reason. There are a lot of teams competing for fans that can all drive to their games. Also the actual cities where they play aren't that big comparatively to the US based metro areas. So the last thing they want to do is put a city name in front and then possibly disengage fans from that team because they don't live in that city or don't like that city.

There are leagues that have naming rules but really I doubt a league would care unless there was vulgarity or some insensitivity in the name. Really the league wants teams to be successful and has to respect a team's decision to name their team what they want to help sell tickets and stay afloat.

Note: In relation to Ben's answer, which is good, I would like to add that in many parts of Europe (I honestly don't know about Asia/Africa so chime in if you do) sports were regulated through local clubs.

In the US for the most part sports are denoted by town when growing up (you play for Smithsville little league), then by school (high school and college) then by town/mascot for professional.

This is very different from the club system which we have in the US (soccer and AAU basketball to name to biggies) but they are no where near as prominent as Europe where for the most part schools have nothing to do with sports and everything filters through club systems.

  • 9
    The irony of saying that Manchester United don't want to put a city name at the front of their title is amusing.
    – Nij
    Dec 27 '16 at 4:59
  • Aside from some London based teams, of whom some do use names based on their location, it also doesn't quite hold up when looking at the bigger picture I'm afraid. The Man Utd example is a winner though :D
    – Don_Biglia
    Dec 29 '16 at 13:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.