2

I define a hat-trick as "three successes of the same kind".

If a bowler bowls a wide ball/dead ball in between consecutive wickets

ie,

W  W  Wd W

Will it be a hat-trick wicket?

What about the rule for no-ball in this scenario? since, it is difficult to take wicket in the free-hit ball.

  • 2
    Three successes of the same kind – Azik Abdullah Feb 27 '13 at 8:50
  • 1
    @SportsFan - Hat-Trick in Cricket doesn't mean three successes of the same kind. Hat-Trick is considered only for wickets in Cricket. See this answer :-) – hims056 Feb 28 '13 at 10:36
6

Wikipedia defines hat-trick as,

A hat-trick occurs in cricket when a bowler dismisses three batsmen with consecutive deliveries. The deliveries may be interrupted by an over bowled by another bowler from the other end of the pitch or the other team's innings, but must be three consecutive deliveries by the individual bowler. Only wickets attributed to the bowler count towards a hat-trick; run outs do not count.

The Concise Oxford English Dictionary defines a hat-trick as:

[...] the taking of three wickets by the same bowler with successive balls

The term hat-trick in cricket has no official definition by its governing bodies, but is a term used by the media and cricket aficionados to describe three wickets (that are claimed by the bowler) in three consecutive deliveries. It is left to each one's perspective if a hat-trick is annulled if three wickets are separated by a wide, but a vast majority would believe that having a wide in between three wickets is NOT a hat-trick, as implied by the definitions above. This is because though the wide delivery is illegal, it still is a delivery, implying that three batsmen are not dismissed in three consecutive deliveries.

The same is the case for a no-ball.

  • provide some references to ur answer – Azik Abdullah Feb 27 '13 at 9:35
  • 5
    @SportsFan What kind of reference are you looking for? Like its mentioned in the answer, hat-trick is not a rule put in place by the ICC and there is no one clear-cut definition. We can only take the part three wickets in three deliveries and interpret it as required. If a wide is bowled in between three deliveries, most would consider it as three wickets in four deliveries and not three and therefore not a hat-trick. – Orangecrush Feb 27 '13 at 10:02
  • it's a good answer, but i need references for wide and no balls bowled in between those deliveries, ur wiki link is generic – Azik Abdullah Feb 27 '13 at 10:05
  • 2
    @SportsFan I dont think you will find any rule or official wordings to clarify your question. Like in the answer provided, it is to be left with each one's perspective. – Renjith Feb 27 '13 at 11:23

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.