0

During the 2002 season when Oakland was using the famous "Moneyball" strategy, they largely looked to on-base-percentage when measuring player value, but this only seems to address how to look for offensive help rather than pitching. How did they discover pitchers like Chad Bradford? Did they use OBP against? WHIP?

1

Looking at Chad Bradford's statistics on Baseball-Reference dot com, his last season with the White Sox before being picked up by Oakland indicated that he would be a top performer. Having faced 52 batters that year:

  • 0 home runs surrendered
  • 17% strikeout rate
  • an incredible 2.82 groundball-to-flyball ratio
  • and a healthy 29% double-play on ground balls

Factor these stats in considering they got him on the cheap. Also he had a sidearm release point, something making it hard for batters to hit, especially relievers.

| improve this answer | |
  • Interesting, but too speculative, I think, to be a proper answer. – chepner Dec 5 '19 at 16:12
  • Speculative perhaps. I'd be surprised if there were many other statistics than these that made him attractive to the A's. – Jason P Sallinger Dec 5 '19 at 16:49
  • 1
    Not really speculative because it was supported by the "Moneyball" narrative. Strange as it may seem today, teams didn't understand the value of ground balls in preventing home runs in 2002. The White Sox were fixated on Bradford's 84 mph fastball, not realizing that his "submarine" release point made up for it. – Tom Au Apr 27 at 4:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.