8

I read a USA Today article that talked about how Tiger Woods is nearly 2000 under par* for his career. I've tried searching, but how does this compare to others all-time?

Obviously this is a rolling score since Tiger could end up shooting over par for the rest of his career and end up at 1500 under or something, but is this the lowest in history? I'm just looking for some comparable stat to compare against the other all time greats' career scores.

  • 2
    I'm interested in these statistics as well, but the article does explicitly state that they have compiled such information. I would assume (given if golf has comprehensive records in previous eras compared to golf today. eg, "strokes gained putting") that this is doable with a tedious amount of work. – user527 May 30 '13 at 19:35
  • I am sorry but this is a really dumb question. There is a mountain of difference in equipment from the 1970s to now. It is night and day. Go out with clubs, balls, and shoes that are vintage 1970 and see if you play as well. The USA article is just sensationalizing something to sell newspapers. This isn't a sport where one player plays against another directly - with the same bad equipment (basketball, baseball, football), this is a scored sport. The only accuracy in comparisons across generations is to take maybe the top 50 from each year and use their scores as a baseline. – Coach-D Aug 30 at 19:21
  • This is like comparing track stars across different eras. So you think all of the best track athletes ever were from the last 10-20 years (that's where most WR fall)? No - it is their equipment, better training methods, better drugs (legal or illegal), better recovery methods, and so on. Something modern golfers get too... In your example Mr. Woods... man his jaw sure got square in his mid-20s, he had the same doctor as several athletes that were getting HGH/steroids and he had the same torque hip issues that several baseball players on steroids got. Hmmmm.... technology. – Coach-D Aug 30 at 19:26
0

In regards to the score versus par number referenced, it's difficult to ascertain a specific answer about how it compares against other greats. However, I think we can safely say that Tiger's number is the lowest in history for the following reasons.

Yearly Scoring Average

Looking at the list of Vardon Trophy winners shows a list of the lowest scoring average for golfers each year as far back when Jimmy Demaret averaged 69.90 for the year in 1947. Viewing these numbers, Tiger Woods won this award and subsequently held the lowest scoring average 9 times (1999 - 2004, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2013) with an average over those 9 years of 68.39. Only 14 other golfers won the award more than once. Additionally, no other golfer on the list even scored as low as the AVERAGE of Tiger's 9 years in a single year. Before 1988, there were only 10 years in which the lowest yearly scoring average was lower than 70.

This strongly suggests that no one in history has come close to touching Tiger's historic low scoring records.

Scoring In Majors (versus Jack)

The widely-regarded top 2 golfers in history are, of course, Tiger Woods and Jack Nicklaus. Jack is the most likely to have a chance to match Tiger in this career score versus par considering his long-term success in majors and the PGA Tour in general. This link from 2014 sought to compare Jack and Tiger over their first 14 major tournament wins. The stats near the bottom of the page tell the tale quite well.

Scoring Average: Jack 71.41, Tiger 70.82

Score Versus Par: Jack +78, Tiger -109

Even in a small sample of 14 wins each, Tiger outscores probably the second best in history by 187 strokes -- or an average of more than 13 strokes better per major. It's hard to imagine a scenario that Jack finished with a better career scoring total versus par considering these numbers.


Prior to 1947, stats are somewhat harder to come by, but a quick look at some of the greats from that era show that scores were much higher during those times. Additionally, match play was much more common in the majors during those times so an accurate number would be impossible to measure. However, Walter Hagen and Bobby Jones are the best regarded golfers of that era and looking at even a few of their winning scores shows that they were nowhere near the level of low scoring seen in today's Tour.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.