While watching a New York Mets game early this season, before one plate appearance the broadcast graphics displayed that catcher John Buck had a batting average (AVG) of .400 and an on-base percentage (OBP) of .396. Several games later I saw a similar phenomenon for Buck, whose OBP was again several points lower than his AVG. (In other words, the stats presented were very likely to be actual and not an on-screen typo.)

How is this possible? By my understanding, the two are calculated as follows:

AVG = (hits) / (at-bats)


OBP = (times reaching first base) / (plate appearances)

It would seem to me that the conditions by which a plate appearance does not count as an at-bat would always result in the batter reaching first.

What could have happened to cause Buck's on-base percentage to drop below his average?


Sacrifice Flies

It can happen because Sacrifice Flies are in the denominator of the on-base percentage


but not in the batting average


For small numbers of at-bats, it is possible (though unlikely) for a player's on-base percentage to be lower than his batting average (H/AB). This happens when a player has almost no walks or times hit by pitch, with a higher number of sacrifice flies (e.g. if a player has 2 hits in 6 at-bats plus a sacrifice fly, his batting average would be .333, but his on-base percentage would be .286). The player who experienced this phenomenon with the most number of at-bats over a full season was Ernie Bowman. In 1963, with over 125 at-bats, Bowman had a batting average of .184 and an on-base percentage of .181.


  • That makes perfect sense; a sac fly shouldn't count against you for batting average, but since you didn't actually get on-base, it wouldn't count favorably towards OBP. Oct 14 '13 at 12:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.