4

There seems to be a lot of cricket fans on this site so I was wondering can anyone explain the major differences between 20/20 cricket and test cricket? I was reading an article recently where a cricketer reckoned that 20/20 cricket would kill off test cricket in 20 years so I'm interested in seeing what differences between the two could lead to that happening.

  • Google is your friend – DSF Mar 19 '14 at 20:41
  • 1
    Color of the ball, Jersey, Sight screen, Cheer girls, World cup, Lights, Powerplay, Super over, new ball, no. of bouncers per over, Duckworth Lewis...(too broad). – Azik Abdullah Mar 20 '14 at 5:00
  • 2
    I think it's a fair question; although there any many differences in style, the major underlying differences are harder for a newcomer to perceive, and therefore are a good fit for a Sports SE question. – Spinner Mar 20 '14 at 8:53
  • 1
    I did say major differences so I wouldn't include color of the ball, lights, cheer girls as being major differences – RoB Mar 21 '14 at 8:52
  • Are the bats different in 20/20 to the ones used in tests? – user6077 Jul 13 '14 at 13:52
3

Major differences between Twenty20 (T20) and Test cricket include:

  • Duration - A Test match may last up to 5 days, and it is unusual for a Test to be completed within 3 days. T20 cricket lasts a matter of hours - perhaps around 3 hours.
  • Results - A Test match has four possible results for a team: a win, a loss, a tie, and a draw. A draw occurs when the time runs out before the match has been completed. To complete a win, a team needs to both score more runs than the other team and normally also take all the wickets of the other team.

    T20 does not include the possibility of a draw. To win, it is only necessary to score more runs; it is not required that all the opponents' wickets are taken.

  • Innings - Each team has two innings in a Test match, of indeterminate length. T20 cricket has one innings per team of 20 overs.
  • Style and requirements - As a consequence of the above factors, the way players approach the game is considerably different in the two forms.

    In Test cricket, players have to be fit enough to spend many hours playing, and batsmen have to be prepared to bat with patience for hours. Bowlers can attack more freely and have greater scope for setting fielders where they wish. In T20 cricket, bowlers have to almost always bowl more defensively, as not conceding runs is more important than taking wickets. Batsmen can be more aggressive from the start, and boundaries are more frequent. Fielders are restricted as to where they may be placed on the field.

Whether the two forms can co-exist remains to be seen. On the one hand, several players have demonstrated that it is possible to perform well in both forms, introducing T20 versatility into their Test game. On the other hand, some are concerned that young players' focus on T20 hurts their development of the qualities, such as watchfulness, needed for Test cricket.

  • 1
    It is not required to take all the wickets of the opponent team. A Test win is possible even without taking a single wicket in both innings. – hims056 Mar 20 '14 at 4:15
  • 1
    @hims056 Agreed, declarations may remove the need to take all the wickets - this was just a broad outline of what is needed. Have edited answer to allow for this possibility. – Spinner Mar 20 '14 at 8:13
  • won't the grounds be made smaller in 20/20 ? – kartshan Dec 29 '15 at 9:27
0

I think you will find that colour of the ball and lights ARE classified as major differences between T20 and Test cricket. For the ball, tests have shown that the white ball swings more than the red ball (for both the Kookaburra and the Duke ball). And recent arguments about playing Test cricket under lights in Adelaide clearly shows that this makes a big difference for the players - namely that when used in Day/Night form, dew and moisture make handling the ball more difficult for the fielding side, as is adjusting to night conditions under lights.

  • 1
    Could you supply some references to back up the statements you've made here? – Philip Kendall Dec 23 '15 at 18:34

protected by Philip Kendall Aug 17 '17 at 14:30

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.