4

Whenever I watch soccer games and see a team having a corner kick, the player taking the corner kick sometimes passes the ball to another teammate before attempting to cross the ball. But, more often than not, the ball either gets taken away, or the cross attempt is unsuccessful.

What I don't understand then is why doesn't the player taking the corner kick just cross the ball right away in the first place, rather than having to pass it to a teammate who eventually would like to cross the ball? It seems to make more sense to me that if a player is going to cross the ball anyway, they might as well do it from the first opportunity they get.

  • The instance of the game plays a big part here. If it's towards the end, and they are winning, then short corners are generally used to safely possess the ball - and against many teams, prevent a counter attack (Barca's mindset against Real Madrid generally), whilst burning away the game. – Nicholas V. May 9 '14 at 16:06
4

First of all the % of goals scored from a corner is quite low, in 2012-2013 in the premiership it was just over 13%. Here is a good article on why Swindon (considered to be proficient at short corners) use the short corner.

Some of the reasons why they use them is to make the corner routine unpredictable, Barca sometimes do this.

Corners are clearly tricky to convert into goals – the evidence is clear – so the need is for something different, and that is precisely what short-corners provide. They stop the opposition relying on the same tactics, the same positioning and the same scouting reports.

Whatever the fans’ opinion on the use of short corners, it is the variety that they give which allows any corner to work – short or long. Like the spin bowler who occasionally delivers one that doesn’t turn, short corners make the more obvious, more direct deliveries dangerous. Short corners draw markers out of the box while longer crosses drive defenders back leaving space for the short corner; it’s set piece tug of way, pulling the opposition this way then that.

Another reason why Barca use this tactic is to keep possession, if the team is not good at corners or unlikely to score against a team who is good at defending corners then it could be wise to keep possession and try work the ball in the box or try a different angle of attack. Defending teams also have the upper hand on corners because they are allowed to get away with so much fouling etc in the box, the fact that keepers are so well protected by refs and the mix of zonal and man marking from corners.

Basically some teams use short corners to try and confuse the defending team who may have been drilled to defend against a certain type of delivery that the attacking team has used in the past, however corners don't tend to lead to a large number of goals unless you've got someone like Drogba attacking the near post.

  • But I'm not referring to teams that pass the ball to keep possession. I'm more talking about teams that pass the ball, only to cross it right away. In my view, there is less success with doing a cross from a pass, then crossing from a corner kick directly. – Adam May 9 '14 at 9:39
  • 1
    @RoB "First of all the % of goals scored from a corner is quite low, in 2012-2013 in the premiership it was just over 13%." - Would you really consider that low? To me, that is decent. – Nicholas V. May 9 '14 at 16:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.