9

The laws of the game prohibit encroaching on a penalty kick whether it is an attacking player or defending player. The keeper is supposed to remain on the line until the kick is taken but in practice this is a loose interpretation; movement off the line is common.

My question is: if another player (besides the keeper and penalty taker) has a foot on/over the line of the 18 yard box or the arc, what grounds are there for a retake or an indirect kick out? Is it a similar loose interpretation which goes unpunished or shall it be referenced as an offside play or simply an infringement?

14

In answer to your first question, let's consider how it should be called.

From Law 14 - The Penalty Kick, Section 1 - Procedure:

The defending goalkeeper must remain on the goal line, facing the kicker, between the goalposts until the ball has been kicked.

The players other than the kicker and goalkeeper must be:

  • at least 9.15 m (10 yds) from the penalty mark
  • behind the penalty mark
  • inside the field of play
  • outside the penalty area

After the players have taken positions in accordance with this Law, the referee signals for the penalty kick to be taken.

Now, if encroachment as defined above occurs, Law 14 - The Penalty Kick, Section 2 - Offences and Sanctions states that:

Once the referee has signalled for a penalty kick to be taken, the kick must be taken. If, before the ball is in play, one of the following occurs:

  • the player taking the penalty kick or a team-mate offends:
    • if the ball enters the goal, the kick is retaken
    • if the ball does not enter the goal, the referee stops play and restarts with an indirect free kick

...

  • the goalkeeper or a team-mate offends:
    • if the ball enters the goal, a goal is awarded
    • if the ball does not enter the goal, the kick is retaken; the goalkeeper is cautioned if responsible for the offence
  • a player of both teams offends the Laws of the Game, the kick is retaken unless a player commits a more serious offence (e.g. illegal feinting); if both the goalkeeper and kicker commit an offence at the same time:
    • if the kick is missed or saved, the kick is retaken and both players cautioned
    • if the kick is scored, the goal is disallowed, the kicker is cautioned and play restarts with an indirect free kick to the defending team

A summary of the outcomes for encroachment (and other penalty kick infringements) is also included in Law 14 - The Penalty Kick, Section 3 - Summary Table.

As for your second question, with the 2016 rewrite of the Laws of the Game, referees were explicitly given broad discretion. In Law 5 - The Referee, Section 2 - Decisions of the Referee, it states:

Decisions will be made to the best of the referee`s ability according to the Laws of the Game and the ‘spirit of the game’ and will be based on the opinion of the referee who has the discretion to take appropriate action within the framework of the Laws of the Game.

The other big change in 2016 was the requirement to caution the goalkeeper for unsporting behaviour if a retake is required due to them leaving their goal line before the kick is taken.

Whether it was intended or not by IFAB, the combination of these two changes have led to referees only taking action when there is blatant encroachment. The alternative, i.e. strict enforcement, would dictate that the goalkeeper would be sent-off for being millimetres off their line for a saved / missed penalty kick twice in a match. This is clearly a disproportionate punishment.

Finally, here's an example of a referee having a penalty kick retaken multiple times for encroachment by both the goalkeeper and outfield players. In my opinion, at the time when this occurred in 2004, he would have been correct. However, by 2017 standards, none of the kicks required referee intervention.

Also, here's a better quality video of a different incident, with replays showing the encroachment. At the time, in 2005, the first two of these calls were probably correct, but to be consistent, the third kick should have been retaken, as a Brazilian defender (in yellow) entered the penalty area before the kick was taken and it was missed.

However, applying 2017 standards, I believe that only the blatant goalkeeper infringement on the second kick should have been retaken. In 2017, this would also require the goalkeeper to be cautioned, but this seems proportionate, given that he was one to one-and-a-half metres off his line before the kick was taken.

  • 3
    +1 for a splendid answer. I used to be a ref as well, and I know the troubles caused by inconsistency. In addition to your answer, I would like to add that "the rule (and interpretation of the rule) is written so that it punishes the offender, and not the 'victim'." It's a good rule, it's just that refs need to be more consistent :) – Qvist May 29 '14 at 10:56
  • 1
    @Qvist I think the best part about it as that it offers immediate restitution to the team that has suffered from the encroachment. However, I do think that goalkeeper needing to remain on the line is very difficult and this causes a lot of retakes. It's very hard to remain perfectly still and only move laterally when making a save. I think there would be a lot less retakes if the goalkeeper was allowed to be on, or up to a metre behind the line. However, as I mentioned in the answer, players moving into the penalty area or arc early really have no excuse. – Reinstate Monica 2331977 May 30 '14 at 0:26
  • 1
    I couldn't agree with you more! As long as the GK doesn't gain a clear advantage, it should be ignored really. – Qvist May 30 '14 at 7:50
  • Three years on and this answer hasn't aged particularly well. I'll make an effort to update it at some point if possible. – Reinstate Monica 2331977 Sep 29 '17 at 0:34
  • Great answer except that you missed (in the 2nd video) that on the 2nd and 3rd penalty there was a defender entering the penalty area - before the kick was taken, that is not allowed unless the result of the penalty is a goal. So both these penalties should acctually have been retaken. – Ola Ström Apr 8 at 8:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.