It is well known that the performance of athletes who suddenly move to a location at a higher altitude than they are used to will suffer; when sports events such as the Olympics are held in a high altitude location, athletes often move to the area much earlier in order to adapt.

The question I haven't been able to find an answer to is: How big of an altitude difference is significant? E.g. Will a sprinter who lives and trains at sea level feel any different competing at 200 - 300 m above sea level?


As outlined in Tim Noakes book "Lore of Runnning".(1)

Performance in races of 60 to 200 m is always superior at altitude, with the benefit improving with increasing altitude. Performance in races of 400 m improve progressively up to altitudes of between 2000 and 2500 m but then begins to return to sea-level values. However, even at altitudes of 4000 m, performance is still slightly better than at sea level. Performance in races of 800 m or longer is always inferior at altitude; this deterioration in performance falls most steeply at altitudes above 2500 m.

enter image description here

(1) Tim Noakes (2001). Lore of Running. 4th ed. South Africa: Oxford University Press. 931.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.