3

In baseball, if a fielder reaches into the stands to attempt a catch, a spectator has an equal right to try to catch the ball.

Is there any difference if the fielder is reaching over the fence into the other teams bullpen, and a member of the opposing team is the "spectator"?

1

From the official baseball rules (http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/downloads/y2014/official_baseball_rules.pdf):

Rule 3.09:

"Players in uniform shall not address or mingle with spectators, nor sit in the stands before, during, or after a game. No manager, coach or player shall address any spectator before or during a game."

That seems to separate "players" from "spectators" pretty clearly, though neither term is defined in Rule 2.00 (Definitions).

The definition of Interference (Rule 2.00 - Definitions) says:

a) Offensive Interference is an act by the team at bat which interferes with, obstructs, impedes, hinders or confuses any fielder attempting to make a play.

Reaching into the stands is done at the player's own risk and no spectator interference can be called, but players in uniform but not currently active (say, on the bench or in the bullpen) are still players and I believe can still be called for Offensive Interference.

Therefore, I'd conclude that a player or coach in the bullpen may not interfere with a defensive player attempting to make a catch while reaching over the wall. If the bullpen had spectators in it for some reason (stand overflow, maybe?), the spectators could try to catch the ball, but you wouldn't have players/coaches in the bullpen then.

| improve this answer | |
  • I agree. Plus when it comes to unwritten rules of baseball, if another team were to interfere, there would be some bean balls flying around. – diggers3 Aug 14 '14 at 20:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.