5

Are there statistics that collect information about the cash flow of sports clubs?

What I am wondering is, in general do the team owners have to spend money to manage the club, for passion (I hope), or can they earn money from this activity as a job or an "financial investment"?

I am thinking about the most important European football/soccer clubs, or US basketball/hockey/football teams and so on

  • 4
    I'll leave the real answers to people with references, but in the USA teams are generally run as businesses, with varying degrees of financial inter-connectedness with the leagues. This means the owner (or owners, if it's a consortium) treats the team as an investment asset; if it is financially successful, they may realize dividends from it, and if it incurs debts they are ultimately liable for them, just like other business owners. – pjmorse Oct 4 '14 at 0:27
  • 3
    In football, the owners get income from tickets, TV rights, shirt sponsors, shirt sales, etc.. and that pays player and staff salaries, as well as any loans the team has. They then decide how much of a transfer budget the manager gets to strengthen the team. Some owners with a love for the club will spend more on the team, and add a higher percentage of income to the transfer funds. Others treat it 100% as a business and are there to make money only. For example Ken Bates sold most of Leeds' best players without spending money to replace them. Arsenal also bring up players then sell them a lot – cantsay Oct 6 '14 at 3:31
4

There are similar questions that has been brought up on other sites. Ultimately though, generally speaking after all annual revenue is collected and all expenses are paid, sports franchises do not make a profit. However majority increase in value annually, hence even if a owner is not making a profit through advertising and sales, their net worth still increases. This fact can be seen in the graphic below.

NFL and MLB Average Franchise Net Worths Over Time

Generally, it is not the motivation of a sports team owner to make a profit, but to have their franchise increase in value. That's not to say that all teams don't make money, but many do not. It does seem that profitability of sports franchises for their owners is more dependent on the change in value of the team from its purchase to when it is sold than how much money it actually makes through ticket sales and television deals. However some teams are able to both make a profit and increase in net worth. A notable example of this can be found in the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim, whom have produced solid profits and steadily increasing value in past years, this is explained in part through the first source, where a user points out:

The Angels were able to sign Albert Pujols to a $254million, 10-year contract due to their just-completed regional cable deal for $3billion.

Another example of both profit and increase in value can be seen in the New York Yankees whom have also been able to achieve record value and steady profits annually through massive television deals. But both profit and value are rare, as typically more valuable teams have far greater expenses.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.