Timeline for Why is a penalty not given if a goal comes right after the foul?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2018 at 3:44 | comment | added | Reinstate Monica 2331977 | @T.E.D. Are you suggesting that the Daily Mail are a better judge of referee competence (or any subject, for that matter) than PGMOL? Either way, the comment was not about his flamboyant mannerisms, it was about the signal itself. | |
| Jul 2, 2018 at 17:43 | comment | added | T.E.D. | @studro - Anytime you find your argument hinges on Mike Dean being an example of proper referee behavior, you really ought to stop and rethink things. | |
| Jul 2, 2018 at 14:55 | vote | accept | luchonacho | ||
| Jul 2, 2018 at 3:18 | comment | added | Reinstate Monica 2331977 | @gdrt I disagree - if they did not, the referee should have signalled advantage before pointing to halfway for the goal. However, the referee's failure to use the signal does not negate whatever advantage was applied. This clip shows Mike Dean doing so in the Premier League (albeit perhaps a little to enthusiastically). | |
| Jul 1, 2018 at 17:19 | comment | added | gdrt | @luchonacho, the whole thing (the foul and the own goal) happened in the blink of an eye. There was neither need nor time for referee to show the repsective "play on advantage" signal. | |
| Jul 1, 2018 at 16:50 | comment | added | luchonacho | But the referee did not do the advantage rule signal, as they do in general. | |
| Jul 1, 2018 at 15:04 | history | answered | gdrt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |