Timeline for Precedents for Excluding Athletes from Sport Based on Nationality
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S May 19, 2022 at 10:49 | history | edited | user24601 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
typo correction
|
| May 18, 2022 at 15:37 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 19, 2022 at 10:49 | |||||
| May 16, 2022 at 16:51 | comment | added | user24601 | @PhilipKendall I have made it all a single flow, no update. I prefer title cases for titles and sentence cases for sentences. There is no rule on this as far as I can see and there are many examples of both. I have thus chosen to leave it in my preferred format. Hope you understand :) | |
| May 16, 2022 at 16:50 | history | edited | user24601 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
adjusted to remove "update", making it all a single flow
|
| May 16, 2022 at 16:48 | history | rollback | user24601 |
Rollback to Revision 5
|
|
| May 16, 2022 at 15:00 | history | rollback | Philip Kendall♦ |
Rollback to Revision 4
|
|
| May 16, 2022 at 15:00 | comment | added | Philip Kendall♦ | @user24601 I'm going to revert your most recent change here. I appreciate this is your preferred style, but Stack Exchange style is for the question to read as one body of work without "updates" or the like. On a more minor note, the title should be a question, not a statement and we use typical American English capitalisation (i.e. only proper nouns are capitalised). | |
| May 16, 2022 at 11:38 | history | edited | user24601 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
small update to put it more in the style I prefer
|
| May 16, 2022 at 10:10 | history | edited | Nij♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Removed irrelevant meta commentary.
|
| May 16, 2022 at 10:01 | history | edited | user24601 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 647 characters in body
|
| May 15, 2022 at 8:13 | history | edited | Philip Kendall♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| May 14, 2022 at 21:04 | answer | added | user2414208 | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 13, 2022 at 19:27 | answer | added | F1Krazy | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 13, 2022 at 16:02 | comment | added | user24601 | @ImClarky That's a difficult one! I would probably say, "No, it isn't included." My understanding is that it's the Olympic team which is excluded, due to actions that the team has taken—namely, doping. Sure, it was state-sponsored. But it's because of what the team did and the lack of trust in the legitimacy of its actions. The members still play as ROC/similar, so they aren't excluded. | |
| May 13, 2022 at 15:41 | comment | added | ImClarky | Do state-run doping programs count? On the one hand, it's a country's actions to perform such actions into which they were subsequently banned, but on the other hand, it's a "internal" sporting matter rather than an "external" matter as is the case currently. The specific example I'm thinking off is the "official" exclusion of Russia from the Olympics, with some Russian athletes competing as members of the ROC. | |
| S May 13, 2022 at 15:23 | review | First questions | |||
| May 13, 2022 at 20:52 | |||||
| S May 13, 2022 at 15:23 | history | asked | user24601 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |