Timeline for Why was Japan's second goal in the WC 2022 Japan-Spain match deemed to be valid?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 10, 2022 at 3:16 | comment | added | Nij♦ | A rugby ball doesn't roll flat on the grass at all; a football does, very often. Judging whether the football has touched the line drawn on deformed grass or non-deformed grass or rough dirt or on any other surface that isn't perfectly flat is just shifting the challenge to an even worse situation, since you can't even see the ground under the ball. | |
Dec 4, 2022 at 16:34 | comment | added | ScottishTapWater | @WS2 No, the overhanging part isn't touching the line is it? It's in the air... | |
Dec 4, 2022 at 8:31 | comment | added | WS2 | @ScottishTapWater But doesn't the question of whether it touches the line give rise to exactly the same sort of dispute as to whether it is over the line? There remains the problem of the overhanging part, which must be exacerbated in rugby with the oval shape. | |
Dec 3, 2022 at 14:44 | comment | added | ScottishTapWater | And this is why the way rugby does it is better... If any part of the ball touches the line it's out. It's far easier to tell that than when a round object has completely passed over it | |
Dec 2, 2022 at 12:46 | comment | added | Alan Birtles | even in that angle the camera isn't completely overhead, a camera in line with the line would show a larger (though still very small) overlap | |
Dec 2, 2022 at 9:53 | vote | accept | user366312 | ||
Dec 2, 2022 at 13:53 | |||||
Dec 2, 2022 at 9:27 | history | answered | F1Krazy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |